Sweatshops essay

Sweatshops essay

Sweatshops In The s. Any type of essay. People who work in sweatshop remain there for a long time because they are not qualified for better jobs. Shop Sweatshop. In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write sweatshops essay unique paper. Detroit, Mich: Gale. When external people attempt to visit sweatshops, guards do not allow workers to speak with sweatshops essay visitors at the threat of penalties, sweatshops essay, firing or even physical punishment.

Popular Topics

Maitland claims, that the multinational business corporations must inform their employees of the risks and hazards, to which each one of them is subjected at the work place, sweatshops essay. In his first case, he describes the following situation: He lives in rural North Dakota and he has a very sickly woman as a neighbour. There is a huge blizzard that leaves the village without electricity and their only option is to use wood stoves and fireplaces. Since his neigbour does not have any of these, sweatshops essay, sweatshops essay is giving her the option to help her in exchange of her antique prize collection. In the second case, the situation is almost the samea man carring a suitcase with a lot of money in it, sweatshops essay, sprains his ancle, but there is sweatshops essay huge torm coming and there is only one person, who sweatshops essay help him, of course in exchange of his suitcase.

Here Maitland provides his argument, that those cases are based on emergencies situation, while the sweatshops in the third world are chronicle condition. Thomas argues, that this is unclear and confussed, sweatshops essay, but is also supporting the idea that in general the international corporation are more willing to limit the freedom of the third world labor, than the business corporations recognized by the CLS. Wich leads us to the main questions and argument of Carson: 1 What is freedom?

Is it exchangable? Does sweatshops essay limit the employees or give them options? First, I would like sweatshops essay begin with a description of sweatshops. The name sweatshop gives us a pretty clear description of how hard is the labor in these pleaces, sweatshops essay. These countries are poor and overpopulated, suffering form unemployement, and the limitations of employement and poverty among the people are something common and chronicle, as sweatshops essay in the text. Yes, that might be true, but with what cost, this person earn his wage?

This would lead me to my next argument about mutual exchange, does it exists between the two parties? I support the idea of Maitland and Friedman, sweatshops essay, that freedom is a transaction that must be biletaral and mutual in order to benefit both parties. But, since the only idea of corporations and business is profit, there is no such thing as equal mutrual exchange. I would like to support my argument with the theory of Ronald Duska, that there is no such thins as relationship other than physical labor provided from the workers to company, sweatshops essay, wich leads me to my argument that there is no equal benefit from both parties, sweatshops essay.

The labor in third world countries, and not only, the poor people working in these sweatshops are viewed as labor, equipment, machinery. Sweatshops essay instruments for money and profit, sweatshops essay. Even if the companies are considering the CLS, their primary and only reaseon is their profit and nothing else. I think that he succesfully and indirectly argued his thesis, providing the reader with his cases regarding CLS. I think that there is no such thing as liberal standartization, when it comesto manufacturers, business and profit. Unfortunatelly moral and ethics, does not take place in the third world, and the multiunational companies are the partie that have the freedom and the choices to control the poor sweatshops essay weak by closing their eyes, with earnings and wages, while limiting the freedom of the individual in the third world.

Free Essays Topics Essay Checker Hire Writer Login. Free essay samples Essay Sweatshops Essay. Sweatshops Essay 9 September Hire verified writer. Sweatshops Essay Essay Example. Related Essays. A limited time sweatshops essay Save Time On Research and Writing. Get My Paper. Popular Topics employment gender childhood love alice in wonderlan adolescence mobile phone civilization human customer service.

conclusion of a compare and contrast essay

It is evident that in sweatshops there is low demand for more human labor and this makes managers to enslave their workers Williams, Sweatshops have always been dangerous and uncomfortable for workers. The working conditions in the sweatshops do not pay well as the average modern white color jobs. Though the working conditions are unfavorable, most of the things used in everyday life such as clothes and shoes are made in these sweatshops. People imagine that the items they use are made in clean automated factories where workers are well remunerated. The society imagines that no pain or suffering is involved when developing these goods.

When people realize the conditions that the workers go through when producing goods in sweatshops, they are quick to judge and curse the employers for mistreating the employees. However, it is important to note that these factories provide jobs for the low working class in the society. Without these jobs, such people would be in abject poverty. This would only lead to more people begging on the streets. If there are a lot of unemployed people in the society, other problems would arise as well. There would be increased prostitution and crime. This would not promote quality of their life instead; it would further deteriorate and put their lives in danger. People who work in sweatshop remain there for a long time because they are not qualified for better jobs.

Though it is evident that the sweatshops owners exploit their employees, they also present to them a livelihood. The employers find that it is not possible to increase the wages for the workers since these would translate to a loss on their side. The only logical method to end the problem of sweatshops that would not lead to employer making loses would be to automate the process of production. This would lead to the workers losing their jobs. Though the employer would require a huge capital to set up the machinery for the company, it would lead to high production in the long run.

The company would be able to produce more goods at prices affordable by the average consumer. However, this would have the disadvantage of rendering most of the workers jobless. Having human workers at the factories doing the work that would otherwise be done using machinery increases the cost of production. This also reduces the number of products produced per unit time. This translates to high prices for the goods produced; these goods end up unaffordable to the average consumer. The customers would no longer afford the goods that the company produces due to increased prices. The employees who work in the sweatshops prefer to maintain the status quo since this would mean that they will keep their jobs although the working conditions are unfavorable.

Companies that capitalize on using sweatshop labor are able to sell their products at lower prices compared to the companies that do not use sweatshop labor. Sweatshops labor is voluntary and people who decide to work there do it because they feel they are unable to acquire a better job due to various reasons such as level of education or qualification. Due to the intensity of work at sweatshops, a lot of labor force is required. Therefore, a sweatshop is able to employ a lot of people who would otherwise be jobless. Research indicates that most people who support sweatshops are employees who work there.

This is because, such employees are aware of the fact that if they would demand high payment for their work, the employers would not be able to sustain them. This is because; the business would become unstable due to high cost of production. In an attempt to lower the cost of production, the employers would be forced to seek less costly labor such as use of machines and automation. If the employers are not able to make profit, there would be less investment in other new businesses as well. This would lead to slow economic growth for the country, and in turn, the currency would weaken.

Weakening of the currency of a country would lead to poor quality of life for all citizens. For example, the Americans citizens protested against the outsourcing of the textile mills. The companies wanted to outsource because they felt that the factories were horrible and polluted the environment. There was also the problem of low wages for the employees who worked in those companies and poor working conditions. However, the Americans protested against the idea of outsourcing the textile mills because, despite being unfavorable, employment at the textile mills was the only job that they could secure Woog, If the employees are provided with better working conditions and they are paid well, the cost of production would increase.

This will lead to the company increasing the cost of the goods sold in order to cover for the production cost. Due to increased cost of goods and services offered by such companies, less people in the society will afford the items due to the sudden increase in cost. This would lead to reduced sales. If people do not buy the products, the company would have less money to spend on its employees and thus, it would be forced to either fire the employees or reduce their wages in order to sustain them. Such company will be forced to either pay the workers less and less, or continue firing its employees until it shuts down. The employer would opt to replace the large number of people with a machine that would be able to produce more goods per unit time at a lower cost of production compared to people working in the sweatshops Sweatshops, Though the working conditions of a sweatshop are unfavorable, they are a good source of income and provide employment opportunities to many people.

It is through these sweatshops that most low income earners are able to afford food for their families. Featherstone, L. Students against sweatshops. London: Verso. Fraser, J. White-collar sweatshop: The deterioration of work and its rewards in corporate America. New York: Norton. Detroit, Mich: Gale. Thomas J. Woog, A. A sweatshop during the industrial revolution. San Diego, Calif: Lucent Books. Need a custom Essay sample written from scratch by professional specifically for you? certified writers online. Sweatshops Working Condition. In many developing countries, children above 5 years are also forced to work. Large corporations often use unethical and even cruel practices in developing countries to force their workers to work in such poor conditions.

There are armed guards in sweatshops, and the top management in developing countries might collaborate with local mafia to gain control of the workforce. When external people attempt to visit sweatshops, guards do not allow workers to speak with the visitors at the threat of penalties, firing or even physical punishment. This vicious cycle of poverty and exploitation should be stopped. The profits of large companies might slightly reduce due to eliminating sweatshops, but at the same time providing at least for basic human needs might increase the performance of sweatshop workers, drive motivation and stimulate the growth of developing economies. The supporters of sweatshops have several arguments warranting the existence of sweatshops. For instance, Kristof states that in some regions working in a sweatshop is considered a blessing for those people who do not have a job and have to dig garbage to find some plastic elements for recycling.

Furthermore, Kristof indicates that the standards of living in the regions with sweatshops soared. However, these arguments only show that the presence of factories in developing countries is beneficial for economic development. None of the arguments set by Kristof actually justifies the practices common for sweatshops: extremely low wages, poor living conditions, excess working hours which are directly related to very low wages , etc. Furthermore, if manufacturing companies adopt some basic standards of payment and working conditions that allow their workers to maintain human dignity, both these companies and the economies of developing countries will be better off. Indeed, workers who have enough time to rest and enough resources to satisfy their basic needs are able to work more efficiently, can reduce the rate of errors and can be more enthusiastic in their work.

Furthermore, higher wages will cause the inflow of additional finance into developing countries; these cash flows will likely stimulate the further increase of living standards in the community.